人生の痕跡を記録し、すべての素晴らしいものを残してください
The quest for youthful, radiant skin has driven the beauty device market to remarkable heights, with at-home tools promising professional-grade results. Among the frontrunners in this competitive landscape is the , a device that has garnered significant attention and a loyal following, particularly in skincare-conscious markets like Hong Kong. As a seasoned skincare enthusiast and reviewer who has tested numerous devices over the years, I've watched the conversation shift from the original to its more advanced sibling. The buzz surrounding the is palpable, with social media feeds and beauty forums abuzz with claims of tightened contours and diminished fine lines. But does this device truly live up to the substantial hype, or is it merely another expensive gadget destined for the back of a bathroom drawer? The purpose of this review is to cut through the marketing noise and provide a thorough, unbiased, and experience-based assessment of the . Over the next several sections, I will meticulously document my journey with the device, from unboxing to long-term results, ensuring you have all the information needed to decide if this investment aligns with your skincare goals.
Upon receiving the Medicube , the packaging immediately conveys a sense of premium quality. The box is sleek, sturdy, and features a clean, clinical design that aligns with the brand's medical aesthetics-inspired philosophy. Opening it reveals a well-organized interior where each component is securely nestled in custom foam inserts. My initial impression was one of thoughtful presentation—it feels like unboxing a professional tool rather than a casual beauty accessory. The contents of the box are comprehensive, designed to get you started immediately. Here is a complete list of what's included:
Picking up the device, the build quality is immediately apparent. It has a substantial, ergonomic weight that feels secure in the hand, constructed from high-grade, medical-safe plastic. The design is minimalist and intuitive, with a simple power button and two mode selection buttons clearly labeled. The dual-head attachment clicks into place with a satisfying magnetic connection, which not only feels premium but also ensures a stable and secure fit during use. Compared to some flimsier devices on the market, the exudes durability and thoughtful engineering from the very first touch.
The Medicube Pro distinguishes itself through a multi-technology approach, moving beyond the foundational microcurrent of the original . At its core are three primary technologies working in concert. First is the enhanced Microcurrent system. While the original device offered microcurrent, the Pro version boasts a more powerful and targeted output. It utilizes the Ussera Deep Shot technology, which employs ultra-short wave pulses to deliver microcurrents deeper into the skin's layers—specifically targeting the muscles (the dermal muscle layer) rather than just the surface. This is designed to exercise facial muscles, promoting lifting and firming effects from within.
Second is the addition of multi-spectrum LED light therapy. This is a significant upgrade. The device features three LED modes: Red Light (630nm) for collagen production and wrinkle reduction, Blue Light (415nm) for acne-causing bacteria, and Green Light (525nm) for calming irritation and improving skin tone. You can use these independently or in conjunction with the microcurrent, allowing for a highly customizable treatment.
Third is the EMS (Electrical Muscle Stimulation) function, accessible via the larger flat head. This mode delivers a broader, more rhythmic stimulation designed for larger muscle groups like the jawline and neck, aiming to enhance contouring and reduce the appearance of sagging. The unique and innovative aspect lies in this hybrid approach. Unlike many single-function devices, the Pro allows you to address multiple concerns—muscle toning, collagen synthesis, and blemish control—with one tool. The technology works by using low-level electrical currents to stimulate ATP (cellular energy) production, encouraging skin cells to function more youthfully, while the LED lights provide photobiomodulation to tackle specific skin issues at a cellular level.
I committed to using the consistently for a period of six weeks, following the recommended protocol of 5-10 minutes per session, five times a week. For the first two weeks, I used the Ussera Deep Shot head on Level 3 microcurrent combined with Red LED light, focusing on my forehead lines, nasolabial folds, and cheek contour. The sensation is a mild, tapping prickliness that is entirely tolerable. By the end of Week 2, I noticed a subtle but definite "post-facial" glow and a feeling of increased tightness immediately after each use, which would last for several hours.
Weeks 3 to 6 involved incorporating the EMS head for my jawline and neck area every other session. To track changes objectively, I took standardized photos under the same lighting every Sunday. The visual evidence, combined with my own tactile experience, revealed clear results:
The results are not surgical, but for a non-invasive at-home device, the cumulative effect on skin laxity and tone is substantial and, in my experience, superior to the results I achieved with the standard .
User-friendliness is paramount for any device requiring consistent use, and the largely excels in this area. The operation is straightforward: apply a generous amount of the included conductive gel to clean skin, attach the desired head, select your mode (Microcurrent+LED or EMS+LED), and adjust the intensity with the plus/minus buttons. The device emits audible beeps to confirm mode changes, which is helpful. The ergonomic shape fits comfortably in the palm, and the angled design of the Ussera head makes it easy to reach contours around the nose, eyes, and lips. The larger EMS head glides smoothly over the jaw and neck.
However, there is a slight learning curve. The manual instructs you to move the device in specific, upward motions, and maintaining consistent contact while the gel dries slightly can require a bit of practice. Re-applying gel is necessary for continued conductivity. The instructions are clear but could benefit from more visual diagrams or a QR code linking to video tutorials. Once the routine is established, a full treatment takes about 8-10 minutes, which is easy to incorporate into an evening skincare ritual. The device automatically turns off after 15 minutes of inactivity, a useful safety feature.
Based on my extensive testing, here is a balanced breakdown of the device's strengths and weaknesses.
The at-home anti-aging device market is crowded, and the Age R Booster Pro sits at the higher end. Key alternatives include devices focusing on single technologies. For microcurrent, the NuFACE Trinity is a classic competitor. It is often praised for its immediate lifting effect but typically lacks integrated LED therapy, making the more feature-rich. In terms of LED masks, devices like the CurrentBody Skin LED Mask offer powerful light therapy but no microcurrent for muscle toning. medicube age r booster pro
Another category is radiofrequency (RF) and microcurrent combos, such as the Ziip Halo. These devices can offer deeper collagen stimulation but often come with even heftier price tags (some exceeding HKD 4,000 in Hong Kong) and may carry a higher risk of discomfort or burns if not used correctly. When comparing cost versus effectiveness, the age r booster pro positions itself as a comprehensive mid-to-high-range option. It is more expensive than basic microcurrent tools like the original Age R Booster (which retails for roughly HKD 1,200 less) but offers substantially more functionality. For someone seeking an all-in-one device that tackles lifting, wrinkles, and blemishes, it presents a compelling, albeit costly, alternative to purchasing multiple single-function devices.
The price of the is undeniably steep. In Hong Kong, it is commonly sold for between HKD 2,580 and HKD 2,880, depending on the retailer and ongoing promotions. The critical question is whether this investment translates to value. From my perspective, the value proposition hinges on two factors: your skincare priorities and your alternative costs. If your primary concerns are loss of firmness, sagging contours, and you desire a non-invasive lifting treatment, the device can be worth it. The long-term benefit of maintaining facial muscle tone and stimulating collagen could potentially delay the perceived need for more invasive procedures.
Furthermore, when considering potential savings, the device may reduce reliance on certain topical products. For instance, the LED functions might lessen the need for separate acne treatments or specific brightening serums. However, it does not replace a good skincare regimen; rather, it enhances it. When amortized over several years of use (the device has a 2-year warranty, common for electronics in Hong Kong), the daily cost becomes minimal. The investment is justifiable for dedicated skincare enthusiasts who will use it consistently. For casual users or those on a tight budget, the original age r booster or a good quality serum may offer a more accessible entry point.
After six weeks of rigorous testing, my overall impression of the is overwhelmingly positive. It is a sophisticated, well-engineered device that delivers on its core promises of firming, lifting, and improving skin texture when used as directed. The integration of multiple technologies sets it apart in a meaningful way, providing a salon-like treatment experience at home. The hype, in this case, is largely warranted for the right user.
I would recommend this device to individuals who are serious about anti-aging skincare, have specific concerns regarding skin laxity and contouring, and are willing to invest both money and time into a consistent routine. It is ideal for those who have perhaps outgrown the basic Age R Booster and seek more advanced, multi-dimensional results. I would not recommend it for those seeking instant, dramatic transformations, for individuals with very sensitive skin that may not tolerate microcurrent well, or for anyone unwilling to commit to a regular usage schedule.
Based on the criteria of performance, design, ease of use, and value, I award the a final rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars . It loses half a point primarily due to its high initial cost and the slight operational learning curve. However, for its target audience, it represents one of the most effective and versatile at-home anti-aging devices currently available on the market.